Jon Sayer

27Nov/112

My Idea for NHL Realignment: be prepared for more moves

I have a confession to make. I like hockey.

This doesn't make any sense if you know me. I don't have many/any friends who do like hockey, and I'm not athletic. I don't even like any other sport. That said, as a man with Canadian heritage, I've been around hockey the fandom of hockey all of my life, even if going to an NHL game or regularly watching a specific team on TV was something I could rarely do.

So when I follow hockey, I do so through newspapers and the Internet. One story that I have been following closely is divisional realignment as a result of the relocation of the Atlanta Thrashers to Winnipeg.

There have been hundreds if not thousands of ideas spread around the internet regarding realignment of the NHL as a result of this event, all of them flawed and full of potholes that would prevent them from being easy sells in the real NHL.

I'm not going to go over every plan here (there are too many!), but I will say that they all seem to ignore the elephant in the room, namely that there will be another move in the next few years. It will probably be the Phoenix Coyotes, but it could also be any number of other teams.

A key problem is that any realignment which preserves the current six-division format will could be broken by these future moves because they will require key rivalries (think Montreal-Boston or the NYC trio) to be broken up.

Where are the risks?

NHL Teams in trouble
Mountain time zone Central time zone Eastern time zone
Phoenix Coyotes Dallas Stars Columbus Blue Jackets
--- --- New York Islanders
--- --- Florida Panthers

All of the teams in the chart above have been mentioned in the hockey media as teams that might potentially move. They all have bankruptcy, arena, or attendance issues, or in the case of the Coyotes, all of the above. I'm not saying these teams will leave. I'm saying they might.

Any realignment must take into consideration that one or more of these teams could disappear. It should also consider where these teams are most likely to end up.

Potential relocation sites
Likeliness IMHO, based on market and arena availability, is indicated by number of *stars*
Pacific time Mountain time Central time Eastern time
Portland *** Las Vegas * Kansas City **** Quebec *****
Seattle * --- Milwaukee *** Toronto (Markham) **
--- --- Houston ** Hamilton, ON *
--- --- --- Hartford *

As a hockey fan in NHL-less Seattle, I've been thinking about where an NHL team might move for a long time. I've done some research and I have good reasons for these assumptions, but I don't feel like outlining all of them right now. I will say this: all of these cities have been mentioned in the media in the past.

You'll notice that the most stars are in the Northeast or American Midwest. You'll also notice that none of the in-trouble teams are in the Northeast, and fewer are in the West. This means we're most likely to have a flow of teams northward and westward.

So here's my solution for next season:

Western Conference Eastern Conference
Pacific Division Central Division Northeast Division Southeast Division
Anaheim Chicago Boston Buffalo
Calgary Dallas * Montreal Carolina
Colorado Detroit New Jersey
Columbus *
Edmonton Minnesota New York I *
Florida *
Los Angeles Nashville New York R
Pittsburgh
Phoenix * St. Louis Ottawa
Philadelphia
San Jose
Winnipeg Toronto
Tampa Bay
Vancouver --- --- Washington

First, we go back to the old-fashioned four division system the NHL had for a generation. Teams are placed with other teams in their time zone to minimize late-night TV watching and travel. There are 7 or 8 teams in each division.

The most likely scenario requiring a realignment is a team moving into the Northeast or Central divisions, so I made these two divisions short one team so no one else gets bumped. A swap between conferences would require another move, but there are options available to us, especially in westward moves.

As far as I can tell, the most important rivalries in the NHL are all preserved. You can keep Buffalo in the Northeast if you would like, but they will be moved into the Southeast as soon as the Nordiques are reborn. Same with Detroit: you could send them to the Northeast and keep Columbus in the Central Division, but they will likely have to move back or force another team to leave the Northeast as the Central and Northeast fill up.

Teams would play 42 games within their division, either 6 or 7 with each team. They would play a home-and-home with all remaining teams in their conference (14 or 16 games) and one game with teams in the opposite conference (15 games). The remaining 9 or 11 games would be with specific opponents outside their division, consisting of historic rivals and recent playoff opponents.

Due to the way this is set up, there's a natural spot for expansion teams to go if the NHL ever wants to go that way.

Let me explain the various underlines and other nonsense in that chart.

Teams with a star * just might leave their towns for greener pastures. They are liabilities for future realignment.

An underlined team can't leave the division they are in (unless they just leave town altogether). This team is locked into the division it is in by sheer geography. Most of them, like most of the entire current Northeast division, have very tight rivalries that simply can't be replaced if they were to be moved. They often have another team in the same state, region, or province.

Italicized teams are a set. They can be moved around, but not without their partner teams. If we move the Rangers, the Islanders and the Devils have to come. If we need to move one team from the Northeast to the Southeast, sort of a worst-case scenario, the only possibility is to swap the NYC trio with the Pennsylvania pair. It's not perfect, but it works.

However, it's possible we might see a flood of teams moving into one division. If that happens, we're going to need to screw with things. Teams will leave their divisions and swap conferences in the order listed in this graph.

Western Conference Eastern Conference
Pacific Division Central Division Northeast Division Southeast Division
Colorado 1> Winnipeg 1< New Jersey 1> Pittsburgh (NYC swap)
Phoenix 2> Minnesota 2< New York I 1> Philadelphia (NYC swap)
Detroit 1> (NE) New York R 1>
Nashville 2> (SE)
Buffalo <1 (NE)
Winnipeg 3> (NE) Columbus (Central) <1

If a move results in a division having more than eight teams, these teams would bite the bullet (or swim in happiness) and move in the order listed. The arrows indicate where they would go.

On the next page, I have a few scenarios to illustrate what I mean. Each are major disruptions, but in each the core of each division is preserved.

I Wish I Was Northwestward Bound

This is wet dream for me. It's also one of the most complicated situations I can think of, requiring each division to be changed.

Columbus and Florida are screwed. They need to move. Together, they move to Seattle and Portland, finally bringing the NHL to the Pacific Northwest and instantly create a massive rivalry with each other and the Vancouver Canucks.

The Pacific Division suddenly has too many teams, so both Colorado and Phoenix move to the Central Division. Now the Central division has one too many teams, plus the whole Western conference has two too many. Both Detroit and Nashville move to the Eastern conference, Detroit with its old Original Six rivals in the Northeast and Nashville with its fellow southern teams.

Western Conference Eastern Conference
Pacific Division Central Division Northeast Division Southeast Division
Anaheim Chicago Boston Buffalo
Calgary Colorado Detroit Carolina
Edmonton Dallas Montreal Nashville
Los Angeles Minnesota New Jersey Pittsburgh
Portland Phoenix New York I Philadelphia
San Jose St. Louis New York R Tampa Bay
Seattle Winnipeg Ottawa Washington
Vancouver --- Toronto ---

Middle America mania

The owners of the Islanders, Phoenix and Columbus have had it, and they're gravitating towards the center of North America: Milwaukee, Kansas City, and Houston. Suddenly, there are too many teams in the Central Division.

This is an opportunity. For the first time in NHL history, we have more teams out of the Eastern Time Zone than in it. We send Detroit and Nashville to divisions they will fit well in and a time zone they prefer.

Western Conference Eastern Conference
Pacific Division Central Division Northeast Division Southeast Division
Anaheim Chicago Boston Buffalo
Calgary Dallas Detroit Carolina
Colorado Houston Montreal Nashville
Edmonton Kansas City New Jersey Florida
Los Angeles Milwaukee New York R Pittsburgh
San Jose Minnesota Ottawa Philadelphia
Vancouver St. Louis Toronto Tampa Bay
--- Winnipeg --- Washington

Return to the abandoned markets

Phoenix and Dallas--two teams that left snowy lands for the sunbelt back in the '90s--are moving. Meanwhile, the New York Islanders also find that they can no longer survive in the NYC area. Brooklyn, Queens, and Nassau aren't working out.

So these three teams decide to move to markets that had their teams taken away in the past: Kansas City, Hartford, and Quebec.

The Islanders go to Quebec, so they stay in the same division and trade NYC rivals for the Canadiens. Rangers fans can still chant "Potvin Sucks" three games a year. Everyone's happy (except Islanders fans). Dallas goes to Kansas City and again nothing changes division-wise.

But Phoenix moves to Hartford, and the Northeast is now saturated with teams. Since there was extra space in the Northeast, no one else has to move... except Columbus, which returns to the Central division to even out the conferences.

Western Conference Eastern Conference
Pacific Division Central Division Northeast Division Southeast Division
Anaheim Columbus Boston Buffalo
Calgary Chicago Hartford Carolina
Colorado Detroit New Jersey Florida
Edmonton Kansas City New York R Pittsburgh
Los Angeles Minnesota Montreal Philadelphia
San Jose Nashville Ottawa Tampa Bay
Vancouver St. Louis Quebec Washington
--- Winnipeg Toronto ---

Everyone go to Canada!

The following scenario illustrates a possible problem: what if we see a flood of teams to Canada? This is where my system begins to break down. There aren't any teams that want to go West, and most spots for moving to Canada are in the East.

Phoenix, Florida, and Dallas have all decided that the place to make money is north of the border, moving to Quebec, Hamilton, and new arena in Markham, Ontario, north of Toronto. Meanwhile, Columbus and the New York Islanders get the same idea, only they want to go to the marginal markets of Halifax and Saskatoon. Not that this makes a lick of sense, but they're doing it.

Halifax, Hamilton, and Quebec are all in the Northeast, so we send the remaining NYC teams to the Southeast. We don't have to swap them with the Pennsylvania teams. Boston finds itself in an all-Canadian division, unless we send Buffalo too to and make it a little less awkward for them. Google Maps engineers notice an uptick of queries for "where the fuck is Saskatoon" in the midwestern United States.

Unfortunately, we are left with an imbalance. The new Toronto team belongs in the East with the rest of the Canadian teams, but it's going to have to stay in the West or make the conferences uneven. They're on the bottom of the totem pole right now, and they've ruined my neat and orderly arrangement, so they'll just have to bite the bullet.

In any case, there are now twelve Canadian teams in a league of thirty.

Western Conference Eastern Conference
Pacific Division Central Division Northeast Division Southeast Division
Anaheim Chicago Boston Buffalo
Calgary Detroit Halifax Carolina
Colorado Minnesota Hamilton New Jersey
Edmonton Nashville Montreal New York R
Los Angeles Saskatoon Ottawa Pittsburgh
San Jose St. Louis Quebec Philadelphia
Vancouver Toronto (new) Toronto ML Tampa Bay
--- Winnipeg --- Washington
Filed under: Ideas, Sports Leave a comment
Comments (2) Trackbacks (0)
  1. Dallas won’t be moving. Tampa and Dallas are the two non-Cali southern teams to make a solid fanbase. Dallas’ issue was Hick’s failed ownership- which has now been solved. I want to correct Bettman’s 90s expansions and relocations more than anything. I say PHX to Quebec, Columbus to Seattle, Florida to Portland. If Isles move outside of NYC it is Hartford’s best shot. Kansas City is always gonna be used as a tool for Bettman to use as a threat. No owners and it would kill the Blues who struggle with statewide television ratings and poor ownership and on-ice records for nearly 30 years. If more teams are crumbling in 5 yers time and Sakatoon has seen growth or the Sabres are confident enough in their market Hamilton or Saskatoon could get a team. Doubtful. Far too small for Sask, and Hamilton is trapped between the ailing cities of Detroit and Buffalo as well as south of the Toronto Maple Leafs- the biggest a-holes in the NHL’s administration.

    Love the breakdown nonetheless, but as a Stars fan who grew up with the Stars arrving when I was a kid- and having seen our pre-lockout marketability- Dallas is far more capable than any other franchise listed- there is a reason is is the 9th most valuable franchise (approx 210million on last rankings)


Leave a comment

(required)

No trackbacks yet.